Wired on super-powers

From: Hal Finney (hal@finney.org)
Date: Wed Jul 09 2003 - 19:28:19 MDT

  • Next message: Phil Osborn: "RE: Tranquility"

    Wired is doing a series on super-powers, based on the August issue of
    the magazine.

    http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/11.08/pwr_invisible.html is about an
    invisibility cloak, and
    http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/11.08/pwr_antigravity.html discusses
    so-called anti-gravity devices, actually lifters powered by ion wind.

    Tomorrow there should be an article on time travel, and the next day
    one on "8 super powers".

    The anti-gravity lifters don't amount to much, IMO; I played with
    ion wind powered pinwheels when I was a boy, and these just aim the
    propulsion downwards. You can't get any significant lifting power
    without using voltages that would be unsafe.

    But the invisibility cloak article is quite interesting. They mention
    an amusing party trick I haven't seen: putting a webcam on your back and
    holding a laptop screen in front of you, allowing people to see right
    through you. Seems it would work even better with a tablet PC, make
    a Halloween costume of a guy with a hole through his chest.

    Unfortunately doing "real" invisibility requires producing a view valid
    from all directions, for which they propose using a 10 megapixel per
    square centimeter display, with fish-eye lenses in front of each 180x180
    pixel block, so that each pixel gets aimed in a different direction.

    The only problem is that computing power to generate 4 square meters of
    such imagery amounts to 10 billion GHz, which is rather far away even
    with Moore's Law helping out. Still, a cruder and smaller version could
    work as a proof of concept.

    The author doesn't consider the possibility of interleaving light sensors
    among the pixels, using the fisheye lenses to focus light coming from
    different directions. That might reduce the computing power requirements
    and make the logic of what to display much simpler; just mimic what is
    being received at the corresponding position and angle on the other side
    of the cloak.

    One thing I liked is that the article discussed the alien's invisibility
    suit in the movie Predator, which I have always thought was a well
    done effect. It seemed realistic in that there was a certain amount of
    lag or distortion when the alien moved, which was not only a dramatic
    visual effect (and probably pretty easy to do) but also realistic for
    the way you'd imagine a suit like that would work.

    Hal



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 09 2003 - 19:38:33 MDT