RE: [Iraq] The real reason for the war

• Previous message: John K Clark: "Re: [Iraq] The real reason for the war"
• Maybe in reply to: John K Clark: "[Iraq] The real reason for the war"
• Next in thread: Dehede011@aol.com: "Re: [Iraq] The real reason for the war"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

From: Dehede011@aol.com [mailto:Dehede011@aol.com]

> mez@apexnano.com writes:
> > Umm, pardon? Iraq wasn't a
> > substantially terror-supporting state.
> > The Iraq - Al Queda link was always wishful thinking.
>
> MEZ, is that the new party line? It is based solidly in mid
> air and doesn't pass the belly laugh test.

It's the consensus of almost everyone who's looked at the issue. Even
Friedman, hawk that he is, concedes that there was no substantial link
between Iraq and Al Queda.

• Next message: Sondre Bjellås: "RE: Killer app? RE: Extro-biz"
• Previous message: John K Clark: "Re: [Iraq] The real reason for the war"
• Maybe in reply to: John K Clark: "[Iraq] The real reason for the war"
• Next in thread: Dehede011@aol.com: "Re: [Iraq] The real reason for the war"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jun 05 2003 - 12:14:34 MDT