Re: [Iraq] The real reason for the war

From: Dehede011@aol.com
Date: Thu Jun 05 2003 - 13:01:06 MDT

  • Next message: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: FWD [SK] Re: A Field Guide to Skepticism (3 of 3)"

    In a message dated 6/5/2003 1:15:41 PM Central Standard Time,
    mez@apexnano.com writes: It's the consensus of almost everyone who's looked at the issue.
    Even Friedman, hawk that he is, concedes that there was no substantial link
    between Iraq and Al Queda.

    MEZ,
           Friedman is so Liberal I can't think of any one that is more East
    Coast Establishment. I like him, I read him from time to time but a hawk he
    isn't.
           The problem is that your phrase "no substantial link" allows you to
    slip, slide and duck better than Muhammad Ali on his best day. Of course we
    found Sadaam giving refuge to terrorists (he apparently murdered one in Iraq,
    remember) we found what two or three training camps. but it wouldn't be
    substantial to you regardless.
           I suggest you get busy and read the postings of the middle easterners
    and the postings of their newspapers on the Internet and forget what your anti
    American, American friends are telling you.
           Buddy this isn't rocket science, just cast your information net a bit
    wider and start getting informed.
    Ron h.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jun 05 2003 - 13:11:21 MDT