From: Lee Corbin (lcorbin@tsoft.com)
Date: Thu Jun 26 2003 - 19:31:40 MDT
Randall writes
> On Thursday, June 26, 2003, at 02:47 PM, Kevin Freels wrote:
>
> > For those who aren't spiritual, this isn't a big leap. You are the
> > information, regardless of how it is stored.
>
> It really is not that simple. Further, there is a problem with
> (the English) language, such that when one refers to a an object,
> it's not clear whether you mean that object or all objects of that
> class. If I talk about a book I own, it's unclear whether I mean
> that I own all the information in all books like it (as many say
> the author does), or only the physical instance of the book. This
> confusion is at the heart of most arguments about both "intellectual
> property" and uploading/copying of people.
But if you are the same person that you were last month,
and you are the same person after you wake up from a coma
wherein your EEG was zero for an extended period, then
what are you besides information? What else could you
possibly be?
Lee
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jun 26 2003 - 19:41:58 MDT