UN food treaty on GM food regulation to get effective soon

From: Brett Paatsch (paatschb@optusnet.com.au)
Date: Tue Jun 17 2003 - 08:13:37 MDT

  • Next message: cryofan@mylinuxisp.com: "RE: META: Time to enforce the List Rules! (personal revelation)"

    Quorum of 50 countries vote to allow rejection of GM
    foods without proof they pose any danger.

    ------------
     UN food treaty on GM food regulation to get effective soon

    http://www.foodingredientsfirst.com/newsmaker_article.asp?idNewsMaker=3637&fn@gm
    Site=AO545

    "The United States and the European Union have been in a
    dispute over genetically modified products, and the
    disagreement has stalled the current round of WTO trade
    talks.

    16/06/2003 A United Nations treaty regulating the trade
    of genetically modified products will soon go into effect,
    after gaining the approval of a 50th U.N. member.

    The Pacific nation Palau ratified the controversial treaty,
    known as the Cartegena Protocol on Biosafety, Friday.
    Fifty nations needed to adopt the pact before it will turn
    into law, 90 days from now.

    The U.N. Environment Program said Saturday that Palau`s
    move will help make use of genetically-modified products
    safer by allowing countries to reject them without proof
    they pose any danger.

    But the agreement goes against current World Trade
    Organization (WTO) rules that require countries to have
    scientific proof of a risk to refuse entry of these products.
    The Associated Press reports none of the major grain
    producing countries has ratified the protocol, including
    the United States.

    The United States and the European Union have been
    in a dispute over genetically modified products, and the
    disagreement has stalled the current round of WTO
    trade talks.

    Genetically modified foods have had their genes changed,
    usually to make them more resistant to disease or to
    produce in greater quantities. Proponents say they pose
    no risk and could work to alleviate poverty. Critics argue
    the genetic mutations could pose health hazards and
    cause havoc in the environment.
    --------

    - Brett Paatsch



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jun 17 2003 - 08:21:57 MDT