RE: The mistake of agriculture

From: Lee Corbin (lcorbin@tsoft.com)
Date: Thu May 22 2003 - 19:55:20 MDT

  • Next message: Mike Lorrey: "RE: The mistake of agriculture (was: evolution and diet)"

    Anders writes

    > Jared Diamond:
    > > "Archaeologists studying the rise of farming have reconstructed a crucial
    > > stage at which we made the worst mistake in human history. Forced to choose
    > > between limiting population or trying to increase food production, we chose
    > > the latter and ended up with starvation, warfare, and tyranny."
    >
    > It also set us on the path towards culture, superhuman intelligence and
    > the stars. While I am no fan of technological determinism, to some
    > extent the "choice" of farming leads to a competitive situation of
    > expanding population, brainpower and civilization that rewards expanding
    > our ecological niche and likely transforming our species.

    Absolutely. The "paradise" of living a hunter-gatherer existence,
    which, Jared Diamond not withstanding, could also often be brutish
    and short, wouldn't be for *me*, even assuming that "I" somehow
    could be other than the product of a 20th century civilization
    (as, I would definitely say, all of us are).

    Emlyn adds

    > Hunting and gathering was a local maximum; getting out of those
    > is never going to be fun. I'm all for it, though.

    Yes, and I hope that it's meant that we ought to get out of the
    local maximum and advance to a better destiny, for everyone's
    sake.

    gts writes
    > [Eliezer wrote]
    > > Let's not forget standing armies. Agriculture enabled people to
    > > produce more food than they needed to feed themselves alone, enabling
    > > the rise of a ruling class that subsisted off other people's work and
    > > could force them to work 16-hour days to feed as many boss-class
    > > individuals as possible.

    > Yes, before agriculture there was no ruling class.

    I would say that from the standpoint of individual psychology, only
    *now* are most people free. Living in a small hunter-gatherer band
    would have meant for most people enduring the domination of a few
    particular (and doubtlessly loathsome) people. One of the glorious
    things of civilization is the individual's ability, by and large,
    to isolate himself from unpleasant people.

    Lee



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu May 22 2003 - 20:05:19 MDT