Re: "Hysteria, Thy Name is SARS"

From: Samantha (samantha@objectent.com)
Date: Mon May 19 2003 - 02:15:30 MDT

  • Next message: Samantha: "Re: Right and left liberal and conservative"

    On Wednesday 14 May 2003 09:14 am, matus@matus1976.com wrote:
    >
    > "She was busy insisting that something [our involvment] was
    > senselss thus lended sanction to those who chose to ignore it as
    > something else [colonial expansionism of the US, a revolution in
    > vietnam, all for tin/oil, etc] instead of doing very much about it.
    > The result, of course not limited to her, was many millions of
    > needless deaths..." and "She wrote what he wrote despite the
    > evidence [to the contrary]...I hold supposed intellectuals who
    > twist the truth responsible for the consequences of being
    > believed."
    >

    Nope, doesn't wash. Nice try.

    > And here you say nearly exactly that
    >
    > I was rooting for the end
    >
    > > of our senseless and murderous involvment in a pseudo-war we
    > > should never have entered.

    It was precisely that and I did root for its end. So what? I had no
    great effect on what happened after we pulled out. Nothing I or
    others like me said was likely to have made a lot of difference
    except where US involvment actually made the problem much worse in
    the region as in our support of the Khmer Rouge.

    >
    > Now clearly, by your own criteria, promoting something that leads
    > to the death of people means you must bare some of the blame for
    > those deaths.
    >

    Nope, that is a poor characterization. Unlike Mr. Fumento I did not
    promote myself as any sort of expert. One who promotes themselves
    as an expert and adviser on a problem does have greater
    responsibility. I will grant however that it was wrong of me to
    personally hold him responsible for millions of deaths. Instead I
    simply hold him as an undependable, irresponsible and amoral
    opportunist posturing as an expert. Such people do cause great harm.

    I
    > I certainly take issue with the accuracy of your summation of
    > Fumento's points, so perhaps you take issue with the accuracy of
    > some of my points, thus clearing you of any blame for the millions
    > of deaths in Indochina. I would like to know which points you
    > contest.
    >

    I won't wate my time on such. That war is over and done with and I
    have *much* better things to do than rehash it with you.

    -s



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon May 19 2003 - 02:19:03 MDT