From: Michael M. Butler (mmb@spies.com)
Date: Tue Apr 29 2003 - 01:33:26 MDT
On Mon, 28 Apr 2003 15:57:03 -0500, Brian Atkins <brian@posthuman.com>
wrote:
> Michael M. Butler wrote:
>> ("Sucralose[tm]") does not show any particular signs of being harmful.
>> It was heavily tested for something like ten years before FDA approval
>> and it *still* is slow to conquer the "big label" soft drinks. *Sigh*.
>>
>
> Look for "Diet Rite" brand at your local supermarkets. Only downside is
> there is some Ace-K mixed in there too for some reason.
Yes. I do know about Diet Rite, thanks. I do not count it as one of the big
labels. It is much less widely distributed than Diet Coke or Diet Pepsi
(around here), and much less often to be found at deep discount than either
of those brands. Getting it from a fountain at the local convenience store
is basically a non-starter. Some Diet RC Cola variant is supposedly also
Sucralose-laden--but that's even rarer hereabouts. So I'm taking my chances
with aspartame while I whittle my waist down.
-- I am not here to have an argument. I am here as part of a civilization. Sometimes I forget.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Apr 29 2003 - 01:43:51 MDT