From: Dehede011@aol.com
Date: Sun Apr 27 2003 - 21:05:21 MDT
In a message dated 4/27/2003 6:52:03 PM Central Standard Time,
philosborn2001@yahoo.com writes: However, they're not planning a new Roman
empire, as far as I can tell. Instead, they've used Afganistan and now Iraq
as demonstrations to the world as to intent, capability, resolve... The rest
of the world can join the winning team or take their chances.
Phil,
I do not know if that article, or you, is directly on target but I
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5
: Sun Apr 27 2003 - 21:18:13 MDT
There is an article in the March issue of Esquire that is being
ballyhooed as being the strategic vision of the governments pet strategist.
You can find it at
<A HREF="http://www.nwc.navy.mil/newrulesets/ThePentagonsNewMap.htm">http://www.nwc.navy.mil/newrulesets/ThePentagonsNewMap.htm>
certainly think you are on the trail.
John Taylor Gatto takes the position that you don't need a conspiracy
if you have a bunch of people with the same bias. Reading the paper I see
books like The Lexus and the Olive Tree, The Mystery of Capital and perhaps
The Lucifer Principle touting a view of the world that if not exactly the
same at least reconcile one with the other. In addition I see in the papers
that every world leader in any field that counts is attending economic get
togethers to discuss their ideas.
From all of this I don't deduce there is a conspiracy but it seems
like there is an opinion beginning to jell. That opinion or "shared bias"
seems to be that like in Barnett's March Esquire article a certain relatively
few countries are causing all the trouble -- that it is time to bring them
into the community of nations and share not only the wealth but the knowledge
of how to get wealth with those poor countries.
Please keep talking, I want to hear more of your thoughts.
Ron h.