From: Damien Sullivan (phoenix@ugcs.caltech.edu)
Date: Fri Apr 25 2003 - 16:23:27 MDT
On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 03:08:03PM -0700, Robert J. Bradbury wrote:
> Can't be remotely "immortal" without giving up normal procreation.
> The hazard function catches up with you over longevities ranging
> from 2000-7000 years. If one stops procreating eventually we
Of course, for an AI the difference between procreation and immortality isn't
necessarily clear.
-xx- Damien X-)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Apr 25 2003 - 16:32:06 MDT