RE: evolution and diet

From: gts (gts_2000@yahoo.com)
Date: Thu Apr 24 2003 - 12:38:35 MDT

  • Next message: Robert J. Bradbury: "Re: SARS: Strategies"

    Rafal Smigrodzki wrote:
    > grs wrote:

    >> Presumably Mr. Hugh M. Species has already done so regarding the
    >> theory of evolution. He accepts the theory of evolution, and accepts
    >> the fact that he is adapted best to the diet upon he evolved.
    >>
    >
    > ### It is more precise to say that this person is likely
    > adapted better to the paleodiet (eat fresh meat, veggies)
    > than to the alternatives available and tested by his
    > ancestors (e.g. eat rotten meat, chalk, and sawdust).

    Fine.

    > Whether there are other types of diet which are better than
    > paleodiet, does not follow directly from the evolutionary argument.

    What does follow, however, is that he knows his 4,000,000 year old paleodiet
    is the best starting point from which to derive his optimal diet. Indeed it
    is the only starting point, as this is the diet he is currently consuming at
    the time the dairy and grain farmers arrive on the scene.

    Consider a more extreme hypothetical to make my point more clear: instead of
    dairy and grain farmers, along come Neolithic "gasoline farmers" who want
    him to start drinking gasoline with each meal. Our man Mr. Hugh M. Species,
    being an educated man with a rational mind, knows better than to drink
    gasoline without first seeing solid scientific evidence that foods from the
    gasoline farmers are worthwhile additions to the diet. He is skeptical of
    the gasoline farmers' claims because 1) he accepts the theory of evolution
    and because 2) he knows he did not evolve on a diet containing gasoline. He
    therefore asserts (just I would) that the burden-of-proof is on those who
    advocate a gasoline diet. If the gasoline farmers can't rise to the
    challenge by offering solid scientific evidence in favor of gasoline
    consumption then our man won't add gasoline to his diet.

    This is the same position I think moderns should take regarding any
    non-paleo food. Where is the evidence that milk and cheese add anything to
    health and longevity? There is none. Likewise with agricultural products.
    There is nothing healthful about these foods that can't be obtained from
    more nutrient-dense paleo foods.

    -gts



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Apr 24 2003 - 12:47:15 MDT