From: Lee Daniel Crocker (lee@piclab.com)
Date: Mon Apr 21 2003 - 13:34:32 MDT
> >> Subtracting water from lean cooked turkey breast leaves
> >> a solid food containing 95% protein.
> >
> > When assembling statistics for nutrition, the most honest,
>
> There was nothing dishonest about my quote, Lee, and I rather
> resent the implied accusation.
I didn't say, or imply, that the number was dishonest; I'm sure
it was quite accurate. But even statistics that are 100% true can
be misleading or less meaningful that others. Being right does
not excuse the obligation to be scrupulous in science; indeed, it
falls upon those of us who seek the truth to be the most diligent
in trying to prove ourselves wrong, and in casting our arguments
in terms not designed to persuade, but to illuminate. Mere truth
is not enough: arguments are judged also on how hard the proponent
bends over backward to be fair, relevant, conistent, and rigorous.
I'm sure the 95% stat is true. But the 80% stat is /more/ meaningful,
/more/ honest, /more/ consistent, and still makes the argument clear,
and is therefore a /better/ argument.
I stand by the statement word-for-word: when assembling stats on
nutrition, the most honest, meaningful stats are percentage-of-
calories, unless there's a very good reason to use some other
statistic. "It sounds better for my argument" is not a good reason.
-- Lee Daniel Crocker <lee@piclab.com> <http://www.piclab.com/lee/> "All inventions or works of authorship original to me, herein and past, are placed irrevocably in the public domain, and may be used or modified for any purpose, without permission, attribution, or notification."--LDC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Apr 21 2003 - 13:43:30 MDT