From: Adrian Tymes (wingcat@pacbell.net)
Date: Thu Apr 03 2003 - 17:05:53 MST
--- "Robert J. Bradbury" <bradbury@aeiveos.com> wrote:
> Can anyone currently subscribed to the ExI list cite
> an actual example where due to the list discussion
> they
> "changed" their mind?
Yes. Granted, it is almost always in contexts where
new information brings different values to the same
system of deductions, rather than where the system of
deductions was itself changed, but it has happened.
For example, I had been thinking cryonics was horribly
expensive, doomed to remain accessible only to the
idle rich; the facts, I have learned, are otherwise.
The emotional debates tend to be unproductive, yes.
Stick to the facts, and you may convince people.
Stick to emotions, and you mainly preach to the choir.
(Unless of course the facts in question do involve
your emotions, such as when trying to convince someone
that something really is that valuable to you.)
This gets muddied by the fact that many of the
professional opinion changers in our society place
much
faith in debating by emotion. This, however, belies
the fact that they are often hired when the facts
alone
are not too convincing - and it also ignores the
specific techniques they use to manipulate emotions,
which tend to have higher success rates than merely
any
random appeal to emotion. (Analogy: striking rocks to
strike a fire over a large area, vs. over a carefully
gathered, dried, and prepared bundle of kindling. The
former may work; the latter works more often.)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Apr 03 2003 - 17:14:13 MST