Re: Ad Hominem fallacy again

From: John K Clark (jonkc@att.net)
Date: Sun Mar 30 2003 - 13:01:41 MST

  • Next message: hubert mania: "Re: Ad Hominem fallacy again"

    "Harvey Newstrom" <mail@HarveyNewstrom.com>

    [Everything you ever wanted to know about ad hominem and much much
    more deleted]

    >That's it. That's ad hominem. Does anybody really want to argue that
    >these are valid techniques for Extropians trying to determine the truth?

    Good God No! I have no interest in discussing such a stupid subject, I'd
    rather debate if an egg should be opened at the big end or the small end.
    During the last war the US was involved with this list spent more time
    documenting the horrors of ad hominem (what an incredibly pompom phrase for
    name calling) than it did on the very real horrors that were going on in
    Afghanistan at that moment; a misdirection of priorities that I hope is not
    repeated.

             John K Clark jonkc@att.net



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Mar 30 2003 - 13:09:40 MST