Re: Can Extropianism and Islam coexist?

From: Michael M. Butler (mmb@spies.com)
Date: Fri Mar 28 2003 - 17:04:56 MST

  • Next message: gts: "RE: More enthusiasm than news in Fox's coverage of war"

    On Fri, 28 Mar 2003 14:03:01 -0800 (PST), Noah Horton
    <nhorton@ectropic.org> wrote:

    > Obviously the at least perceived anti-western attitudes of many muslims
    > are one place where anti-extropic themes can be found. Yet another that
    > comes to mind is that there are bits in the Koran to the effect of, "Live
    > your life as closely as possible to that of Muhammed." Such passages,
    > per my understanding, are often interpreted literally to mean that your
    > life should be as similar as possible, including things like not watching
    > TV if Muhammed didn't. Those are just some starter examples to get the
    > conversation started.

    Cards on the "credo" table time. I have gotten along well with some people
    who call themselves Muslims--or I *think* I have. But since then I've
    learned that a smile can be a sign of discomfort, too; so I might not have
    a clue what was _really_ going on. This is part of the classic existential
    puzzle.

    For all I know, someday this post will be used to issue a fatwa on me. My
    hopes and my fears are counterparts.

    At this time, the-me-whom-I-am-today finds Shariya (Islamic theocracy)
    incompatible with the kind of place I'd like to live in, or (perhaps) be
    resuscitated to after being cryonically suspended. This is entirely
    separate from the question of whether or not such a world, or indeed any
    future world, would "want" to bring me back.

    So: a world government based on Shariya is not one I-right-now can support.

    In the spirit of minding my own business, I have for many years been
    willing to tolerate the fact that Shariya is in force in various places
    around the world--I have not felt obligated to do anything about it, though
    I wince at what I perceive as some of its secular effects. Ergo, I
    conjecture I could accept being brought back to a world where some fraction
    of the population was still subject to it.

    What fraction? I don't know. Not me, thanks.

    Now, is there such a thing as "Shariya lite"? Is there such a thing as
    genuine peaceful coexistence with the current crop of "advocates" of global
    Shariya, given their tactics and rhetoric? I have serious doubts.

    Are the advocates of global Shariya correct in their claims that all who
    call themselves Muslims but do not institute/promote Shariya are false, and
    worse than infidels? I don't know. But the fact of the outspoken claim
    bodes ill, and cannot prudently be ignored.

    I also agree with some of the Shariya proponents, and others, that there
    are signs that the Western culture/system I grew up in is sick, or fragile,
    or vulnerable, in some significant ways; and I conseqently fear that it
    might not be able to perk up, clean up, and successfully memetically
    compete with a vibrant theocratic movement of one sort or another in the
    long run. What to do?

    Ask me again in 20 or 40 years.

    I can imagine all sorts of weird future end-runs that would make Shariya
    more tolerable---want to vote, woman? change your sex, go vote, just make
    sure you get back to the kitchen before Hubby gets back from work; want to
    steal--OK, we cut off your hand and you don't get to have a new one for a
    month---

    But that's very much not the world we live in today.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Mar 28 2003 - 17:13:44 MST