GUNS/MILITARY/BAD THINGS: TBW vs FAMs, was Re: Super-GUN!:Wired News

From: Michael M. Butler (mmb@spies.com)
Date: Fri Mar 28 2003 - 14:21:44 MST

  • Next message: Spudboy100@aol.com: "Re: GUNS/MILITARY/BAD THINGS: TBW vs FAMs, was Re: Super-GUN!:Wired News"

    I'm going to go Lorrey for a minute: ;)

    The Russians, just by the way, are reported to have been fielding a two-
    shot disposable thermobaric weapon for some time now. They coined the term,
    and some of the translated documents I've read seem to indicate that the
    Russians make a distinction between thermobarics and fuel-air munitions
    like the ones the US has employed in the pre-Afghanistan past. Not sure if
    that's just NIH at work. (Not Invented Here, not National Institutes of
    Health).

    From the "baric" part of the name, I am guessing it has to do with the
    creation of a convection cell to enhance the kill effect, whereas FAMs, I
    deduce/recollect, are area effect, just go boom and explode or fry the
    lungs, eardrums, etc. of anyone unfortunate enough to have breathed in the
    mix.

    On Fri, 28 Mar 2003 14:51:13 EST, <Spudboy100@aol.com> wrote:

    > When a Gun Is More Than a Gun 
    >
    >
    >
    > <A
    > HREF="http://wired.com/news/conflict/0,2100,58094,00.html">http://wired.com/news/conflict/0,2100,58094,00.html>
    >
    > Thermo-Baric rifles don't kill, people do!! ;-)
    >
    >
    > By <A HREF="
    http://wired.com/news/feedback/mail/1,2330,91,00.html">Noah
    > Shachtman</A>
    >
    >
    > 02:00 AM Mar. 20, 2003 PT
    >
    >
    >
    > <<PICATINNY ARSENAL, New Jersey -- It is among the most horrific weapons
    > in any army's collection: the thermobaric bomb, a fearsome explosive that
    > sets fire to the air above its target, then sucks the oxygen out of
    > anyone unfortunate enough to have lived through the initial blast.
    >
    > Last year, the U.S. military used such weapons for the first time in
    > combat, to incinerate suspected underground al-Qaeda hideouts in
    > Afghanistan. In the next few months, the U.S. Army will start putting
    > this sweeping power in the hands of individual soldiers.
    >
    > "This significantly increases the firepower that can be put in a single
    > person's hands," said Reuben Brigety, an arms researcher at <A
    > HREF="http://www.hrw.org/">Human Rights Watch</A>. "I'm not aware of any
    > other conventional munitions used by a single person that can have the
    > same destructive power."
    >
    > Thermobaric grenades and mini-rockets were among dozens of current and
    > future munitions the military demonstrated this week at <A
    > HREF="http://www.pica.army.mil/Public/">Picatinny Arsenal</A>, the Army's
    > lone research-and-development center for armaments and ammunition.
    >
    > According to Picatinny officials, thermobaric ammunition will be tested
    > this spring with the <A
    > HREF="http://www.dtic.mil/ndia/infantry/burk.pdf">Bunker Defeat</A>
    > rocket launcher -- a shoulder-mounted, disposable system that was first
    > deployed in Afghanistan. It'll also be tried out with the <A
    > HREF="http://www.hqmc.usmc.mil/factfile.nsf/7e931335d515626a8525628100676e0c/d50a120f00de543d8525627b006b1fec?OpenDocument">M203</A>,
    >
    >
    > the grenade launcher American grunts have used for decades.>>
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Mar 28 2003 - 14:29:23 MST