Re: first brain prosthesis, supposedly

From: Adrian Tymes (wingcat@pacbell.net)
Date: Wed Mar 12 2003 - 15:44:48 MST

  • Next message: Technotranscendence: "Patriotism"

    --- cryofan@mylinuxisp.com wrote:
    >
    http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99993488

    Fairly straightforward to use as an enhancement, if it
    does what they say it does. Say you're about to do
    something you know in advance you don't want to
    remember: switch it off, with a pre-set timer to
    switch back on when the forgettable experience has
    passed. Honorable (to most) applications include most
    soldiers (seeking to avoid post-traumatic stress
    disorder), and people who have to document - and thus,
    look at - opened mass graves; dishonorable (to most)
    applications include most forms of prostitution (if
    the sex is good enough that one would want to remember
    it, that would seem to correlate with truly voluntary
    participation), and certain soldiers (like the ones
    who would provide said graves' contents).
    Anyone care to speculate on how long, after it is
    approved for human use (beyond mere trials), someone
    will hook it up this way? (Which is not to say how
    long *from now* it'll come into use: it'll go through
    the standard trials for its intended use whether or
    not anyone but us thinks of this.)



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Mar 12 2003 - 15:52:49 MST