From: Christian Weisgerber (naddy@mips.inka.de)
Date: Wed Mar 12 2003 - 05:44:15 MST
spike66 <spike66@attbi.com> wrote:
> CNN is claiming that the Pakistanis are closing in
> on bin Ladin. If he is taken, does it give anyone
> else here hope that his capture could somehow prevent
> a war with Iraq? Are those two things linked in any
> way?
No and no.
> Is it too optimistic of me to keep hoping the
> Iraqi military will mutiny, collectively realizing
> the absurdity of attempting a defense by flesh and
> blood against silicon and steel?
Rising against Hussein with the expectation that US troops would
bail you out has proven suicidal in the past. The USA has a history
of encouraging rebellion against Hussein in Iraq and then sitting
back and watching gleefully as it is squashed.
A more reasonable tactic might be to wait for an actual US invasion
and then surrender as quickly as possible. How practical this is
depends on the details of the US attack. You can't surrender to a
B-52. Which raises the interesting question whether the US wants
to capture the Iraqi soldiers or prefers to kill as many as possible
by air attack.
-- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Mar 12 2003 - 06:40:32 MST