Re: Join the not-knowers, was RE: Giant anti-war demonstration in Melbourne (IRAQ)

From: Brett Paatsch (paatschb@ocean.com.au)
Date: Tue Mar 04 2003 - 23:52:20 MST

  • Next message: Spudboy100@aol.com: "Re: ExI servers or connection down?"

    Rafal Smigrodzki wrote:

    > I think
    > I am still slightly, just ever so slightly, against the war (for
    short-term
    > selfish economic reasons, and a worry that this might be the beginning
    > of the World Government)

    I don't follow you reasoning here Rafal. Would you not see the Bush
    administrations decision to go to war without a Security Council resolution
    and against resolution 1441 (which puts the decision as to when the
    "one final opportunity" is up in the hands of the Security Council) as
    against a trend to World Government? Seems to me to be a very
    substantial poke in the eye for international law, may even set it back
    50 plus years.

    If the US steps away from multilaterally toward a series of bilateral
    agreements wouldn't you expect the global economy to be less efficient
    and that this might effect the role out times of technologies you might
    wish to avail yourself of?

    Personally I find it difficult to forget that it is the same Presidential
    administration that seems to be countenancing stepping away from the
    UN that is also trying so hard to ban embryonic stem cell research
    wherever it can. Maybe the coupling is irrelevant and coincidental.

    Brett



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Mar 04 2003 - 23:30:42 MST