Re: IRAQ: Why a new Resolution is NEEDED.

From: scerir (scerir@libero.it)
Date: Wed Feb 26 2003 - 16:13:00 MST

Next message: Brett Paatsch: "The opportunity in the problem (was Re: IRAQ: Why a new Resolution is NEEDED.)"

Previous message: Gary Miller: "RE: IRAQ: Why a new Resolution is NEEDED."
In reply to: Robert J. Bradbury: "Re: IRAQ: Why a new Resolution is NEEDED."
Next in thread: Dehede011@aol.com: "Re: IRAQ: Why a new Resolution is NEEDED."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> Very interesting point. If it hasn't been amended, then one has to
> presume that any votes (vetos, etc.) by Russia are null and void.

Not Russia but the Russian Federation [?] is a permanent member
http://www.un.org/Overview/Organs/sc.html#MEMBERS

Next message: Brett Paatsch: "The opportunity in the problem (was Re: IRAQ: Why a new Resolution is NEEDED.)"
Previous message: Gary Miller: "RE: IRAQ: Why a new Resolution is NEEDED."
In reply to: Robert J. Bradbury: "Re: IRAQ: Why a new Resolution is NEEDED."
Next in thread: Dehede011@aol.com: "Re: IRAQ: Why a new Resolution is NEEDED."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Feb 26 2003 - 16:15:11 MST