From: Gary Miller (garymiller@starband.net)
Date: Wed Feb 26 2003 - 15:40:50 MST
What is the Party of Citizens. Is this just a single vocal
anti-American trying to make himself sound more important than he really
is, an Al-Qaida Public Relations cell, or a legitimite political
organization?
After a web search I did find a reference to political party in
Vancouver. It was a one page address essentially stating that they were
a political party. Is this the same one?
How many members are in the party?
What does the party stand for other than disliking the United States?
When reading a posting such as this it helps to understand the source
and what their full agenda is.
What has been pointed out previously on this list is that as soon as the
US pulls back their troops.
Sadam will once again cease to cooperate with or expel the inspectors.
Will Canada then who relies almost entirely on the US for it's defense
pay to redeploy troops to the gulf in the event that happens?
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-extropians@extropy.org [mailto:owner-extropians@extropy.org]
On Behalf Of Party of Citizens
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 3:54 PM
To: extropians@extropy.org
Cc: loges-de-corbeaux@smartgroups.com
Subject: Re: IRAQ: Why a new Resolution is NEEDED.
U-S-A suffers from delusions of grandeur. Western Europe is a larger
economic unit than U-S-A. The world without U-S-A makes everything it
needs from paper clips to rockets which take us into space. U-S-A is
Canada's biggest trading partner but if U-S-A were to drop into a black
hole in space tomorrow, Canada would suffer economically for only a few
years as it can trade quite well with Asia (another economic bloc as big
as U-S-A) and Europe. Also Canada is bigger in area than our neighbour
to the south and would quickly become the "New West".
Right now, El Moron is frightening, if not terrorising the world with
his war-mongering evil-doer ways. As long as the UN maintains a strong
presence in Iraq, there is no threat of war with Iraq's neighbours. UN
peacekeepers have stayed for decades in other parts of the world. Why
not Iraq? How should the UN pay for the peacekeepers? By selling enough
Iraqi oil. If the UN force costs in the billions, so be it. Iraq will
pay and the peace will be maintained. There is no need for time limits
on Iraq. The most they have is a few box cars of biological and chemical
agents buried in the desert. Agents the use of which would be suicidal
as long as UN has a presence.
El Moron is a terrorist thug who threatens to destabilize the Gulf
region and the world with a war which has UNKNOWN CONSEQUENCES (a point
raised by Madelaine Albright recently on CNN). Keeping the UN
peacekeepers there in place of El Moron's blood-lusting alternative has
KNOWN CONSEQUENCES, ie the consequences of PEACE.
Yes we need a new resolution...a resolution for peace.
POC
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Kai Becker wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 26. Februar 2003 08:19 schrieb Wei Dai:
> > BTW, isn't the U.S. already in breach of the U.N. charter by
> > enforcing the no-fly zones, which were never authorized by the
> > Security Council? What about the 1989 Panama invasion, which was not
> > authorized by the Security Council either?
>
> Yes, we should start to think about invading the USA and establish a
> government that obeys international law. There's even enough evidence
> (i.e. evidence of Mr. Powell's standards) that the US still has
> biological WMDs (which they are not allowed to have) and they are
> actively developing new weapons - land mines - that are forbidden
> IIRC. Hey, how much cheap oil would _that_ give :-)
>
> Kai
>
> --
> == Kai M. Becker == kmb@kai-m-becker.de == Bremen, Germany ==
> "Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently
> advanced"
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Feb 26 2003 - 15:44:27 MST