From: Damien Broderick (thespike@earthlink.net)
Date: Tue Feb 18 2003 - 14:42:16 MST
The pdf paper
http://www.utoronto.ca/jcb/pdf/nanotechnology_paper.pdf
strikes a familiar tone of weary dismissal at the real implications of
molecular nanotech, citing that deep genius Gary Stix:
======
Some commentators on NT have examined the implications of NT but have often
focused on distant, controversial applications. For example, Bill Joy wrote
an influential and widely discussed paper in Wired magazine [10], about
'gray goo'. Steven Block, Stanford biophysicist, suggests that much of this
hype is an illogical extrapolation of current research. 'Nobody has a clue
how to build a
nanoassembler, much less get one to reproduce' [11].
Others have tended to hype the potential applications of NT. Gary Stix, who
edited a special issue of Scientific American on NT [12], has observed that
'there has emerged a cult now of futurists who foresee NT as a pathway to a
technological utopia: unparalleled prosperity, pollution-free industry, even
something resembling eternal life' [13].
========
Ah well. One wonders how they'd have handled claims for electricity's likely
benefits back when the frog's leg was twitching.
Damien Broderick
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Feb 18 2003 - 14:44:09 MST