RE: Increasing Reading speed, Please reply

From: Dickey, Michael F (michael_f_dickey@groton.pfizer.com)
Date: Tue Feb 18 2003 - 08:58:25 MST

  • Next message: Dickey, Michael F: "Oil and Iraq war debate on NPR"

    -----Original Message-----
    From: gts [mailto:gts_2000@yahoo.com]

    Nate wrote:

    > What are the best ways to increase reading speed. Does increasing
    > speed have drawbacks. Do the computer programs give you results, if
    > so how much are they exaggerating the results they advertize.
    > Let me know thanks, Nate

    "The trick to speed reading is learning how not to "sound out" the words in
    one's mind as one reads. But as above it pleases me to sound out the words
    in my mind as I read, and so I lost interest in speed reading. "

    Nate, I second gts's comments, I read often and have read a lot about speed
    reading but was quite skeptical of it. The other day I gave it a shot while
    reading something I didn't particular enjoy but needed to read. You have to
    concentrate on not subvocalizing as you read (I understand some people do
    not, and I wonder if deaf from birth people read faster) because reading in
    that manner limits your speed to the subvocalization speed. As I understand
    it, the process is something like

    1) brain recognizes word through pattern recognition
    2) word is subvocalized
    3) word entered into memory (kind of)

    When looking at it like that, its hard to understand what the
    subvocalization is for, since part of recognizing a word necessarily entails
    recognizing that word! So anyway, I tried it the other day and made a
    concentrated effort to not subvocalize but I lead my eyes in the reading
    with a finger (another tactic often suggested) After each sentence I would
    stop and attempt to repeat the sentence, to my astonishment I found I often
    could repeat it word for word, with more accuracy than if I had
    subvocalized. The retentioned seemed to be better than the conventional
    type of reading, but it is very difficult to get used to reading without
    subvocalization, its like soaking up information without your upper level of
    conciousness being aware of it. I think that might be the role
    subvocalization plays, your super fast pattern recognition and information
    processing capable brain telling your relatively dimwitted serial process
    simulated 'conciousness' that you are in fact reading.

    I need to practice more, but I keep tending back to subvocalized reading as
    gts mentions, because it seems more enjoyable?

    Michael Dickey.

    LEGAL NOTICE
    Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this E-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Feb 18 2003 - 09:00:56 MST