From: Randall Randall (wolfkin@freedomspace.net)
Date: Mon Feb 17 2003 - 21:40:26 MST
Lee Daniel Crocker wrote:
>>(Emlyn O'regan <oregan.emlyn@healthsolve.com.au>):
>>Why isn't the US going to war with Iceland, immediately? I don't think that
>>the doves on this list have provided any solid reasons for not going to war
>>with Iceland. And who is any of us to say what the terrible implications of
>>not going to war with Iceland might be? Iceland says it doesn't have any
>>WMD, but is there proof?
>>
>>History very well may prove the peaceniks and commies to be just another
>>bunch of Chamberlains on this issue. I doubt that the US can afford to wait
>>and see on matters of potential massive aggression. Given that no one has
>>proven beyond doubt that preemptive, proactive defensive action against
>>Iceland is unjustified, is there any other moral course of action?
>
>
> Refresh my memory--when was it that Iceland lobbed SCUDs at Israel,
> and called the US "The Great Satan", and tried to assassinate our
> President?
Israel is not a part of the US.
Who cares what Iraq calls the US?
Assassination attempts are cause for war? Would you also opine that,
if Cuba had the means to do so, it should immediately make war on the
US?
-- Randall Randall <randall@randallsquared.com> 'Institute regime change everywhere... to "None of the above."' -- Alex Future Bokov
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Feb 17 2003 - 21:44:29 MST