From: Emlyn O'regan (oregan.emlyn@healthsolve.com.au)
Date: Mon Feb 17 2003 - 18:31:43 MST
Lee Daniel Crocker wrote:
> I'm still in the undecided camp; if my rhetoric lately has been
> somewhat hawkish, it's only because I'm truly embarrassed at the
> pathetic quality of arguments I see from the other side. There
> probably are some legitimate arguments for not acting right away,
> but all I've heard from the anti-war crowd is the usual pacifist
> drivel that war is wrong, there must be a better way, yada yada.
My general argument is that you don't go to war against someone unless you
have a good reason to. I haven't seen a single argument supporting going to
war with Iraq that didn't look plain stupid.
Someone tell me, poor silly fool that I am, why anyone would want to go to
war with Iraq?
> I also totally reject any notion that the present government of
> Iraq is legitimate and deserves respect under international law,
> and the notion that action might actually increase the threat of
> terrorism is predicated on the ridiculous notion that those who
> hate us have or need legitimate reasons.
It still begs the question of why you would want to go to war in the first
place.
Emlyn
***************************************************************************
Confidentiality: The contents of this email are confidential and are
intended only for the named recipient. If the reader of this e-mail is not
the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any use, reproduction,
disclosure or distribution of the information contained in the e-mail is
prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please reply to us
immediately and delete the document.
Viruses: Any loss/damage incurred by using this material is not the sender's
responsibility. Our entire liability will be limited to resupplying the
material. No warranty is made that this material is free from computer virus
or other defect.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Feb 17 2003 - 18:33:50 MST