Re: Performance enhancement with selegiline

From: Rafal Smigrodzki (rafal@smigrodzki.org)
Date: Sat Feb 15 2003 - 22:18:17 MST

  • Next message: Michael M. Butler: "Evil Emanations? was Re: self censorship urged on science journalists"

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Robert J. Bradbury" <bradbury@aeiveos.com>

    > The only way medicine and lifespan extension science is going to
    > make progress is to work its way out of the box that one size fits
    > all. The best progress we might make is to acknowledge those situations
    > in which an individuals perspective may indeed be valid. Should a
    > physician reject a treatment with which one in a million lives
    > might be saved?

    ### If you can predict exactly which patient will benefit, it's great, which
    is why I am so eager to hear about any progress from US Genomics, or
    Perlegen.

    If you can't find the one-in-a-million guy, your NNT will be one million,
    making the drug perfectly useless.

    Hopefully, by the time I retire, we will have full diagnostic resequencing
    of every patient's genome, so the latter situation would not occur.

    Rafal



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Feb 15 2003 - 22:20:31 MST