From: Michael Hubbard (michael@mbhubbard.com)
Date: Fri Feb 14 2003 - 14:06:39 MST
Delurking for a moment...
Are anti-war protests in the US also anti-American, then?
And I'd differ on the Gore thing, too. Gore wouldn't neccessarily look for any reason he could find to attack Saddam. He would more likely have attempted to actually prosecute, or as GBII might say, persecute, a war on some actual terrorists rather than invading an already broken and mostly contained nation.
----- Original Message -----
From: Spudboy100@aol.com
To: extropians@extropy.org
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 1:57 PM
Subject: Re: Giant anti-war demonstration in Melbourne
<snip>
Anti-war protests are merely anti-American protests, under the anti-war figleaf.
Had Al Gore achieved a plurality in the electoral collage, and become President; the world-wide protests against American actions would have still persisted, unabated.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Feb 14 2003 - 14:25:12 MST