Re: Fuel Efficient Cars (was Oil Economics)

From: BillK (bill@wkidston.freeserve.co.uk)
Date: Sun Feb 09 2003 - 09:07:42 MST

  • Next message: Harry Hawk: "Fixing the Unknown"

    Sat Feb 08, 2003 05:23 pm Rafal Smigrodzki wrote:
    > ### This is such a strong argument against gas taxes: taxing gas is
    > exchanging *human lives* for a pile of cash at the IRS.

    But..... the USA traffic deaths are still worse than many countries with
    mostly smaller cars and higher gas taxes.

    The excellent site http://www.scienceservingsociety.com/default.htm
    that Edwin Evans referred us to is packed with useful data. They have an
    article published in the SF Examiner 9th Dec 2002 by Leonard Evans
    entitled 'We need higher taxes on gas' which eloquently sets out the
    case.
    Quote:
    'While there is near universal agreement in the technical community that
    making vehicles lighter increases fatalities, there is no corresponding
    agreement that increasing the fuel economy of vehicles reduces the total
    amount of fuel consumed in the nation. Making a vehicle more
    fuel-economic reduces the cost of travelling each mile. This encourages
    more driving, less car-pooling and less use of alternative
    transportation modes. In the long run, it makes longer commuting trips
    more acceptable.
        Although there is no consensus on whether making vehicles more
    fuel-economic increases or decreases the total amount of fuel the nation
    uses, there is universal agreement among economists that increasing the
    cost of a commodity reduces its consumption.'
    end Quote.

    Leonard Evans is the same person that published the previous report that
    said that big cars provide better driver protection in crashes. He
    appears to have come to the conclusion that increased death rates in
    spite of larger cars must mean that Americans are 'bad' drivers. Other
    articles show that young males with the fastest reactions have the
    highest death rate. So it is not technical skills at driving that are
    the problem - it is the way they are driving that is the problem.

    I suspect that Newton's Laws of Motion have an affect as well. If your
    SUV has a much greater mass then it will tend to keep going in the
    direction of motion, especially at higher speeds. i.e. it is not as
    steerable as a smaller, lighter car.

    The countries with the lowest traffic death rates appear to have the
    strongest enforcement of traffic laws and drink-driving laws.

    So, there seems to be two options for the future that Americans have to
    face up to:
    1) Higher gas prices are the only way to reduce consumption and reduce
    the power of the oilfield-owning states.
    2) The freedom to drive just as you please on the roads must be
    restricted in order to save lives.

    BillK

    __________________________________________________________________________
    Freeserve AnyTime - Go online whenever you want for just £6.99 a month for
    your first 3 months, that's HALF PRICE! And then it's just £13.99 a month
    after that.

    For more information visit http://www.freeserve.com/time/ or call free on
    0800 970 8890



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Feb 09 2003 - 09:10:22 MST