Re: [Fwd: NYT: Nanotech Sidelines---warning]

From: natashavita@earthlink.net
Date: Tue Feb 04 2003 - 07:08:32 MST

  • Next message: scerir: "Re: Why did the U.S. & Allies Stop Last Time?"

    From: Anders Sandberg asa@nada.kth.se

    On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 11:09:35PM -0800, Michael M. Butler wrote:
    >
    >
    > FROM NANOTECHNOLOGY'S SIDELINES, ONE MORE WARNING
    >
    >
    http://www.nytimes.com/2003/02/03/technology/03NANO.html?ex=1045299506&ei=1cker@!
    > &en=dc4c6b06081c0f81

    This is important reading for everybody who want to make
    transhumanism affect the mainstream, rather than being the
    losing memetic side. ETC are *very* successful in spreading
    FUD about nanotechnology. The trick is not to rush out and
    tell the public that the sky is falling, but to tell the
    huge pre-existing activist networks and intellectuals that
    nanotech is the next big thing, it fits in with the general
    evil hegemony they believe in and that there are real things
    to worry about. Then they are going to do the job for you.
    It is exactly the same strategy I have repeatedly pointed
    out on this list. The difference is that transhumanism
    doesn't do this much.
    _____________________

    This is exactly the strategy the Pro-Act pointed out at Extro-5. My entire
    talk was based on this.

    Unless and until those on this list, members of Extropy Institute and our
    affiliates are ready and willing to work with us, we will only continue to
    complain and grieve.

    If you, Anders, and others want to be active, please work with us!

    While I am in transition at this moment, one of my top priorities is to
    develop funding to address this and other issues.

    Natasha Vita-More

    --------------------------------------------------------------------
    mail2web - Check your email from the web at
    http://mail2web.com/ .



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Feb 04 2003 - 07:10:53 MST