From: Lee Corbin (lcorbin@tsoft.com)
Date: Thu Jan 30 2003 - 22:27:28 MST
Damien writes
> [Lee wrote]
> > But you can listen to radio all day long, tuning in to ABC News,
> > CBS News, or NBC news, and you'll hear none of this.
>
> http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/01/30/1043804465550.html
>
> Europeans rally behind Bush
> January 31 2003
> By Peter Fray
> London, Karen DeYoung
> Washington
>
> A group of eight key European countries yesterday called for a united front
> against Saddam Hussein, boosting American diplomatic efforts to secure UN
> backing for war and further isolating France and Germany.
This is getting ridiculous. The American media appears utterly
silent about this. (Perhaps I should watch more television, and
get more news that just a five-minute summary on the hour.) Yes,
I know that buried somewhere within the pages of The New York
Times, the L.A. Times, or even the San Jose Mercury that story
will be found---but the selection bias is obvious.
I would like to know what prominence the above article got
in the Australian press.
> Well, you could always try the Aussie press.
All I want is an objective news summary, which I am evidently
not getting from the lead articles of the New York Times.
I hope you are serious. I hope that I could subscribe instead
to something more objective. But almost all American papers
merely parrot the content of the NYT.
I simply want not to be able to tell the ideology or opinions
of my news sources. Is that so impossible? IS THAT SO
IMPOSSIBLE?? Evidently the *only* summary sources at my
disposal come from those whose selection of stories show
an ideological bias from either one direction or the other.
It's very irritating.
Lee
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Feb 02 2003 - 21:26:04 MST