Re: Iraq: the case for decisive action

From: Samantha Atkins (samantha@objectent.com)
Date: Thu Jan 23 2003 - 21:14:40 MST


Dickey, Michael F wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Max M [mailto:maxmcorp@worldonline.dk]
>
> "So far Bush is doing a very poor job convincing anybody that he is morally
> right in attacking Irak. Especially the arab countries are
> convinced it is all just a ploy to get cheap oil. Exactly the situation that
> turned Osama and many other arabs against the
> USA. So how can that be a long term solution?"
>
> The fact that Sadam is a murderous racist tyrant despotic dictator is moral
> justification enough.

With no or little consequences and death to only him and his
direct guard and troops that *might* be enough. But this is far
from the case.

> The fact that Europeans do not find this as a moral
> justification is a testament to the liberalized moral relativist notions
> prevalent in Europe at the moment.

This is nothing but empty rhetoric. The latest polls show that
70% of the American people believe we should not use military
means at this time, that we should give more time to inspections
and diplomatic means. Of course you can make your empty
accusations against them also. But at some point you really
need to notice that a great deal of the world and of US people
do not believe this is the correct course of action. Call them
whatever names you will, the numbers are against you.

> You also seem to be oblivious of the
> fact that this murderous racist tyrant also controls the worlds second
> largest supply of the cheapest and dense sources of energy in the world, and
> surprisingly he has used it for murder and tyranny. This is NOT about
> 'cheap' oil so evil oil companies can profit, its about getting the cheapest
> most plentiful source of energy, in fact the second largest depository of
> it, out of the hands of a murderous despotic tyrant.
>

He hasn't been able to do much of squat with that oil for the
last decade in case you missed it. There are many murderous
despotic tyrants in the world. Why do we go after this one in
particular at this time? Are you sure oil and positioning US
forces don't have at least something to do with it?

- s



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Feb 02 2003 - 21:26:02 MST