Re: Re:Solar govt in a postmortal world: voting system

From: avatar (avatar@renegadeclothing.com.au)
Date: Wed Jan 22 2003 - 21:34:19 MST


Thanks for your thread, interesting reading.

However I note the Indonesian and Phillipines archipelagos retain a unitary
government despite separation.

Despite their being enough material to construct ringworlds or Matrioshka
brains or space colonies to a very large extent (if that was the course
adopted) current human "conservative form" reproduction rates would have to
slow down a lot if postmortalism arrives, under a "conservative" analysis of
the possibilities, since any yearly reproduction starts to approach the old
doubling-the-grain on a chessboard scenario.

Under a "conservative Tiplerian Omega Point" scenario solar system
reproduction would be slowed under whatever physical substrate until the
achievement of the Omega Point.

I am interested in what happens in the next billion years in the solar
system as well as the next hundred or thousand.

Towards Ascension
Avatar Polymorph

34 After Armstrong

In Celebration of the Techno-Rapture
www.paradigm4.com.au/way
Maximum choice and minimum non-consensual force
Avatar Polymorph
Star A Star
Alpha Null
Radiant Era
Neon Orthogenesis
Axiom Flux
----- Original Message -----
From: <alexboko@umich.edu>
To: <extropians@extropy.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 11:30 AM
Subject: Re:Solar govt in a postmortal world: voting system

> From: "Alex Future Bokov" <alexboko@umich.edu>
> X-Mailer: YaBB
>
>
> 1) The whole model seems to tacitly assume that planetary surfaces are
where
> most of the action will be. If so, why? If not, what would be the
necessity
> and feasibility of governing millions of orbital habitats when the natural
> unit of property and governance would be the person or people who own a
given
> orbital?
>
> 2) I refer you to this thread...
>
http://www.extropy.org/bbs/index.php?board=61;action=display;threadid=54105
> ...posted by me, and largely ignored. Probably with good reason,
> since it was so long. Still, it might point the way to a
> workable, property and contract-based alternative to government
> altogether. Btw, I don't claim authorship of that document. The original
> (http://www31.brinkster.com/anarchitect/) was posted by someone who
refuses
> to identify themselves.
>
> 3) Elaborating on the feasibility issue in item 1. I assume that among the
> billions of people inhabiting the solar system there will be a number who
> take issue with this government, or even with having a government at all.
The
> short supply-lines and rapid communication on a planet surface allow for
very
> flexible and granular coercive tactics in dealing with dissenters. How do
you
> coerce dissenters aboard a deep-space orbital? Send in the space marines,
> and wait a couple of years for them to arrive? Wait five or six hours for
> dispatches to arrive from the front? Mobilizing enough force to insure
victory
> would be prohibitive. The cheap alternative would be to simply fling large
> rocks at orbitals, but that amounts to genocide. So here we have it-- a
"Solar
> Government" that's anything more than a voluntary certification authority
> would be facing the choice between tremendous expense and genocide
everytime
> someone decided to seccede.
>
>
> ----
> This message was posted by Alex Future Bokov to the Extropians 2003 board
on ExI BBS.
>
<http://www.extropy.org/bbs/index.php?board=67;action=display;threadid=54461
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Feb 02 2003 - 21:26:02 MST