Why does the USA still have troops in rich Europe?

From: Damien Broderick (thespike@earthlink.net)
Date: Wed Jan 22 2003 - 12:09:49 MST

Next message: Dehede011@aol.com: "Re: War is bad... it's still bad, right?"
Previous message: EvMick@aol.com: "Re: Iraq: the case for decisive action"
In reply to: EvMick@aol.com: "Re: Iraq: the case for decisive action"
Next in thread: scerir: "Re: Why does the USA still have troops in rich Europe?"
Reply: scerir: "Re: Why does the USA still have troops in rich Europe?"
Reply: Lee Corbin: "RE: Why does the USA still have troops in rich Europe?"
Maybe reply: Spudboy100@aol.com: "Re: Why does the USA still have troops in rich Europe?"
Maybe reply: estropico@virgilio.it: "Re:Why does the USA still have troops in rich Europe?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Why does the USA still have troops in rich Europe?

Good point.

Why?

Why did Rome still have troops throughout the rich Empire?

  Damien Broderick
  [surely it *can't* be that simple]
  [no no no]

Next message: Dehede011@aol.com: "Re: War is bad... it's still bad, right?"
Previous message: EvMick@aol.com: "Re: Iraq: the case for decisive action"
In reply to: EvMick@aol.com: "Re: Iraq: the case for decisive action"
Next in thread: scerir: "Re: Why does the USA still have troops in rich Europe?"
Reply: scerir: "Re: Why does the USA still have troops in rich Europe?"
Reply: Lee Corbin: "RE: Why does the USA still have troops in rich Europe?"
Maybe reply: Spudboy100@aol.com: "Re: Why does the USA still have troops in rich Europe?"
Maybe reply: estropico@virgilio.it: "Re:Why does the USA still have troops in rich Europe?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Feb 02 2003 - 21:26:02 MST