Re: Iraq: the case for decisive action

From: EvMick@aol.com
Date: Wed Jan 22 2003 - 11:43:51 MST

• Next message: Damien Broderick: "Why does the USA still have troops in rich Europe?"
• Previous message: Dickey, Michael F: "RE: War arguments"
• Maybe in reply to: BillK: "Iraq: the case for decisive action"
• Next in thread: Damien Broderick: "Why does the USA still have troops in rich Europe?"
• Reply: Damien Broderick: "Why does the USA still have troops in rich Europe?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

In a message dated 01/22/2003 11:55:25 AM Central Standard Time,
Spudboy100@aol.com writes:

> Why does the USA still have troops in rich Europe?

Good point.

Why?

EvMick

• Next message: Damien Broderick: "Why does the USA still have troops in rich Europe?"
• Previous message: Dickey, Michael F: "RE: War arguments"
• Maybe in reply to: BillK: "Iraq: the case for decisive action"
• Next in thread: Damien Broderick: "Why does the USA still have troops in rich Europe?"
• Reply: Damien Broderick: "Why does the USA still have troops in rich Europe?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Feb 02 2003 - 21:26:02 MST