From: Randall Randall (wolfkin@freedomspace.net)
Date: Tue Jan 21 2003 - 12:40:25 MST
Dehede011@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 1/21/2003 12:24:14 PM Central Standard Time,
> wolfkin@freedomspace.net writes: I think some Middle Eastern folks might use
> the term 'army of occupation' to describe what you are referring to as
> 'influence'.
>
> You could say that but then you would be demonstrating that you are
> incapable of reasoning.
That's a very broad claim. Of course, you probably didn't really mean that,
but are hoping that I'll just have read what you meant to say. I'm somewhat
unclear whether 'you could say' refers to the aforementioned citizens of
countries in the Middle East who might use that term, or whether you are
claiming that my having stated that they use that term demonstrates that
I am incapable of reasoning.
> The British through their Parliment claimed to rule us and were here
> with their army to enforce their decision whether we liked it or not.
> We claim no sovereignty in those countries and are there only as the
> guest of their government to help deter the likes of Sadaam. On occasion
> when the danger was past we have left per agreement.
Is it the case that we've left? I dunno whether that happened or not.
I think that in the current world climate, a country in that region
whose rulers said 'No' to the US would soon find that their country
needed regime change, and might even find themselves part of Evil Axis.
> But, then you knew that
> didn't you? You just hoped I didn't know and that you could muddy the water.
Of course. Since we disagree, it's obvious that I am only trying to
make things less clear. Funny, that.
-- Randall Randall <randall@randallsquared.com> 'Institute regime change everywhere... to "None of the above."' -- Alex Future Bokov
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jan 21 2003 - 17:10:22 MST