Re: Non-local force fields vrs. nanotech?

From: Eugen Leitl (eugen@leitl.org)
Date: Sat Jan 18 2003 - 14:39:46 MST


On Sat, 18 Jan 2003, John Grigg wrote:

> The interesting post (below) was on Cryonet regarding the use of
> non-local forcefields as the key means to reanimate cryonauts. I
> wonder what knowledgeable listmembers think of the idea.

John, the name below
 
> Yvan Bozzonetti.

says it all. That particular Bozzo has been haunting the list for a very
long time. I don't know whether he's borderline or a full blown nut, but I
just hope he and Jack Sarfatti and Archimedes Plutonium don't start
breeding (well, they could hire Clonaid, or something).

The real answer is that the bottleneck is suspension, not
nanoreconstruction. Latter has no particular physical limits why you
shouldn't be able to process vitrified bulk at molecular and atomic
detail.

Save of consulting God or using traversible spacetime portals no one can
reconstruct information which has been erased.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jan 21 2003 - 17:10:21 MST