RE: What is the meaning of this? (was Disbelieving in belief - a variant - Postscript)

From: Damien Broderick (thespike@earthlink.net)
Date: Fri Jan 10 2003 - 20:29:08 MST

Next message: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: Whose business is it, anyway?"
Previous message: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: What is the meaning of this? (was Disbelieving in belief - a variant - Postscript)"
In reply to: Lee Corbin: "What is the meaning of this? (was Disbelieving in belief - a variant - Postscript)"
Next in thread: Samantha Atkins: "Re: What is the meaning of this? (was Disbelieving in belief - a variant - Postscript)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> Who is correct?

Brett, obviously. One statement declares intuitive access and fealty to an
indefeasible Truth, the other provisional acceptance of an explicitly
frangible position.

> Thanks (whichever way you respond),

Aw, that's okay.

Damien Broderick

Next message: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: Whose business is it, anyway?"
Previous message: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: What is the meaning of this? (was Disbelieving in belief - a variant - Postscript)"
In reply to: Lee Corbin: "What is the meaning of this? (was Disbelieving in belief - a variant - Postscript)"
Next in thread: Samantha Atkins: "Re: What is the meaning of this? (was Disbelieving in belief - a variant - Postscript)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 17:35:51 MST