From: Lee Corbin (lcorbin@tsoft.com)
Date: Fri Jan 10 2003 - 20:11:58 MST
Brett Paatsch claims that the two extended statements
A. "I believe that life begins at conception. I believe
that any other points we might choose are essentially
arbitrary and uncertain. And I believe that this is
a view founded not in religion, not in faith, but on
the logic of the matter.
B. "My working hypothesis is that human existence begins
at conception, and I contend that this is a view founded
not in religion, not in faith, but on logic."
are not equivalent. I claim that they *are* equivalent.
Who is correct?
Thanks (whichever way you respond),
Lee
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 17:35:51 MST