i disagree
where is the proof ?
how does "maximal social outcomes" coincide with high poverty,
homelessness, a stuffed-to-overflowing penal system, and as
Dale Carnegie said a place where "...rich and poor are both free
to sleep under bridges".
some people don't win in a market economy
> simply because each individual is
> compelled to serve the consumer, the people, or suffer material
> privations. Privations which would not exceed those suffered had
> the individual chosen to forgo human association altogether, and
> therefore such privations cannot be measured as an initiation of harm.
i don't understand. are you saying that someone who "suffers material
privation" (aka Poverty), deserves it. Is the market equivalent of
an outcaste or hermit ??
-banjo