A good post from Chris Hind, but I do disagree with one thing.
>The way I wish to be uploaded will be through gradual
>incremental uploading so that "I" will be the uploaded,
>virtual, digital, being rather than a digital duplicate
>running around as me.
A gradual upload might be a good idea for practical reasons, you could catch
any bugs in the procedure before they caused serious harm, but I don't see
how it would make any difference from a philosophical viewpoint. Since all
the atoms in our bodies are constantly changing and information is the thing
that makes me be me and you be you, I don't think it's meaningful to
differentiate between a "copy" and the "original" of a person. Are copies of
Windows 95 inferior to the "original", whatever that means?
If I have not convinced you it's because you only read a copy of this post,
the original, as it appeared on my computer screen when I typed it, was much
better.
John K Clark johnkc@well.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.i
iQCzAgUBMnb+Y303wfSpid95AQEOiQTsDuXQffMQUmChWP45xnKqv6p36ITdxosQ
92o0e3o3dUT9mb7+i1QmffwKvcuRs7mgCqbRkd+t4TSrbNX27wGcuqnr8xzWMyjm
J9SjvNr0PjwgWnkHLfXsvqt1hWcNecpsMvnQHRh9g0Sqj7BmerLoxgmhU8GVzjP8
tZiN4Sl+6TejpnNR9WTQdmCK9gnmbpdJs3t28sRB0auFRCz5K9I=
=Iljr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----