> >From an Extropian angle, the self-animated theory of ownership may
> be problematic because it invokes a kind of spiritual basis for rights.
> But since rights are a mental construct, and so is, perhaps, the soul,
> no big deal. ? Any ideas?
I would also claim that ownership is a mental construct. In fact I
might be pushed to argue (I'm kind of tired as I write this) that many
of our "rights" follow from that concept we call ownership.
-Oliver
/ Oliver Seiler \/ Need a problem solved? Erisian has the answers! \
\ oseiler@unixg.ubc.ca /\ Erisian Development Group - pure R+D /
/ \/ POB 3547 MPO, Vancouver, BC CANADA, V6B 3Y6 \
\______________________/\___(604)_683-5364__________FAX:_(604)_683-6142___/