There are lots of contexts where this already happens, including
playing war games, financial trading, and web surfing. High decision
rates don't imply fast economic growth.
>The "SI Dream" scenario is a researcher (probably a grad student at
>MIT, drinking Jolt cola at 2AM and programming when he should be
>studying for an English exam.) The researcher is attempting to enhance
>a decision-support system by interfacing it to a knowledge base and to
>a graphical information-presentation system. ... his first trial run
>is an attempt to optimize his prototype. He succeeds, and installs the
>next version. With this version, he optimizes the operating system ...
>Then, he grabs all the workstations in the dorm, via the net, and
>oprimizes them. ... then all computers on the campus, and then the
>web. ... By the end of the trading day, he owns a controlling
>interest in a nice collection of companies on the NYSE.
I can't say this is impossible, but it really is very unrealistic.
We have had half a century of experience with computers, and no
similar takeoff has occured, or anything close. We have had feedback,
lots of it, but growth rates have been relatively steady. I think you
need a good story about why your scenario hasn't yet happened to make
it at all plausible.
Robin D. Hanson hanson@hss.caltech.edu http://hss.caltech.edu/~hanson/