Re: Property [was Re: The Education Function]

Michael Lorrey (
Thu, 17 Dec 1998 18:38:59 -0500

Joe E. Dees wrote:

> Mr. Lorrey sounds like a sterling candidate for The Order. Been
> reading the Turner Diaries, Hunter, Serpent's Walk and Unintended
> Consequences lately, have we?

What is this in reference to? My description of the theories of people like McVeigh? I never said I beleived in them, so please keep your rude insults to yourself. I have served this country faithfully in the military, and I have marched with lesbians, argued in support of economic equality for minorities, as well as many other things those people would find abhorrent. Your rude and unfounded leaping to conclusions is wholly unwarranted.

Now, given the theory I posted, can you refute the facts of any of it? If you can, and convince me, then you've done better than I, because according to these facts, they are right in this instance, as far as I can see. The problem with government is there tend to be many 'right' positions, because government and the law is so convoluted, and its the one with the biggest guns or the best PR, or the most votes that wins, which is really the only thing that can nullify an argument like theirs, which is why it takes events like Ruby Ridge, Waco, and the Montana Freemen to end such political 'heresies'. Considering that it takes such violence to resolve these conflicts is a strike against government, not for it.

Mike Lorrey