Only Ad Hominem Appropriate ?

Ian Goddard (
Wed, 26 Nov 1997 17:32:22 -0500

Hara Ra ( wrote:
>Jerome wrote:
>> Ian Goddard has not been "ranting", IMHO.
>> All he as done is ask that those who would know the truth, examine the
>> facts.
>I am under the belief that this mailing list is about Extropian topics
>and I totally fail to see what TWA800 has to do with Extropian ideas.

IAN: So, since you defined Abraham's TWA 800 arguments,
which were 100% ad hominem, as "truly meaningful," and
thanked him for posting them, and yet found my arguments,
100% facts, as "ranting" inappropriate for the list, it
follows that only ad hominem as appropriate for the list.

I quite disagree.

VISIT Ian Williams Goddard ---->