Only Ad Hominem Appropriate ?

Ian Goddard (igoddard@erols.com)
Wed, 26 Nov 1997 17:32:22 -0500

Hara Ra (harara@shamanics.com) wrote:
>
>Jerome wrote:
>>
>> Ian Goddard has not been "ranting", IMHO.
>>
>> All he as done is ask that those who would know the truth, examine the
>> facts.
>I am under the belief that this mailing list is about Extropian topics
>and I totally fail to see what TWA800 has to do with Extropian ideas.

IAN: So, since you defined Abraham's TWA 800 arguments,
which were 100% ad hominem, as "truly meaningful," and
thanked him for posting them, and yet found my arguments,
100% facts, as "ranting" inappropriate for the list, it
follows that only ad hominem as appropriate for the list.

I quite disagree.

****************************************************************
VISIT Ian Williams Goddard ----> http://www.erols.com/igoddard
________________________________________________________________