But current humans have goals that are not copasetic. For instance, Janet
Reno's and the Branch Davidians, Jeremy Rifkin and many of us, Saddam
Hussein... etc. ad nauseam!:) Is there any reason to believe all sophoctopodes
would coordinate together in a way humans do not? (This is not a trait of
humans alone. Chimps have wars too.) Heck, there are even humans who
believe humanity should cease to exist -- e.g., deep ecologists, religious
fanatics.
>>Current phylogenetic trees have all
>>animals as one small branch of life. The real evolutionary diversity is
>>in the bacteria and archaea; animals are just rearrangements of masses
>>of the animal eukaryotic cell.
>>
>>Molluscs are different, yeah. "In the microorganism camp", probably
>>not.
>
>I apologize for my part in the misunderstanding. I was not referring to raw
>genome similarity. OK?
I think the point was that molluscs might be more closely related to us, ergo,
more likely to allign with us. If relatedness is a key, then they are.
However,
I doubt it is. In fact, I bet genetic similarity is not helpful at all.
Ideology and
motives will most likely depend on other factors.
BTW, I believe the rational thing -- what benefits their long range self-
interest -- for sophoctopodes to do would be not to war against humans.
The benefits of sentient diversity benefit them as well as us.
Daniel Ust