Again: cheap, quick way to uplift. It's kind of like the poor man's uplift
experiment.:)
>> What standard do we
>> use to judge?
>
>The question is better put, what standard do *you* use to judge? Moral
relativism
>is serving me well these days...
Then, it is not wrong _objectively_ to you to cross-breed?
>But scientists do have ethical guidelines for themselves. Unfortunately, they
>don't help much when you're stuck in the middle of a gray area.
Guidelines are not perfect.
>> >>1. Will crossbreeding chimps and humans help us augment human beings?
>>
>> I believe my initial post answers this question. The data from it will
>> also give us more parameters on just how far intelligence can be
>> stretched inside the biotic realm.
>
>If your above suggestion is true (not just hand-waving), then it may be a valid
>reason. I don't want to argue the merits, but suffice it to say, if I were
>deciding funding, I'd need some pretty good evidence.
Understood. I actually think crossbreeding would not help much. It would
be too
random/chaotic. I doubt it would produce viable much less fertile
offspring. The
only reason I went on with this was to clear up matters in my own head. I do
think, though, that uplifting chimps by other methods might prove helpful in
augmenting humans. Also, I suspect, a lot of the developmental patterns are
similar between apes and humans, such that insertion of genetic sequences
might have similar effects in both.
Daniel Ust