------=_NextPart_000_0056_01BCF45E.629D2420
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Abraham Moses Genen
**************************************************************
Being dedicated to the future progress of humankind=20
should be the prime concern of all civilized beings.=20
**************************************************************
Dear Fellow Extropians:
Having read Mr. Goddard's speculations, conjectures ( and possibly =
paranoid delusions)repeatedly, may I respectfully suggest that he =
consider reading Aristotle on scientific method followed by Blackstone =
on the rules of evidence.=20
AMG
-----Original Message-----
From: Ian Goddard <igoddard@netkonnect.net>
To: extropians@extropy.org <extropians@extropy.org>
Date: Tuesday, November 18, 1997 5:49 AM
Subject: NY Times Lies Re: Goddard
>
>The New York Times editorial "Conspiracies, Real=20
>and Imagined" (11/14/97) falsely states that:=20
>"Mr. Goddard now says he INVENTED the tale [the=20
>Navy-Missile theory] to give the Government a=20
>'black eye.'" (emphasis added)
>
>I was contacted by Matthew Wald with the New York=20
>Times the day the CNN story hit, over a week before=20
>that NY Times editorial. I explained to Mr. Wald=20
>that I never admitted to perpetrating a sham or a=20
>hoax, that I have only presented eyewitness accounts=20
>and press reports pertaining to military activity=20
>on July 17, 1996. I "invented" NOTHING. I was even=20
>a relative late comer to the USN-TWA theory.
>
>I also sent him all the messages I have sent here.=20
>But nevertheless, the New York Times ignores what=20
>I actually say and instead they say that I said I=20
>invented the whole thing. Clearly, they chose to=20
>publish the false over the true. Why???!!
>
>This is a naked farce, a deliberate attempt to=20
>destroy the truth, the Navy-missile theory, and=20
>me to boot. Why would they do this? Other reports=20
>claim I wrote the so-called "anonymous Internet=20
>document," which was written by former 747 pilot=20
>Richard Russell. The unrelenting year-long sweep=20
>of disinformation throughout the media points to=20
>only one logical answer to that question: there=20
>is a massive media-wide cover-up underway.=20
>
>I have spoken with reporters who tell me they can-
>not cover witnesses accounts. When I ask why, no=20
>answer is given. All the major network programs,=20
>even fringe programs like HARD COPY, refuse to show=20
>the radar tapes, except a 2 second flash by Prime=20
>Time Live that prevented any meaningful perception=20
>of their content. Richard Russell, who had extra=20
>copies he forgot to give the FBI when they took=20
>the masters, has tried and tried to get media to=20
>show the tape, with no luck. It's authenticity is=20
>not in question. The FBI has conceded authenticity.=20
>It's a fact that Russell has inside contacts. The
>FBI has been interrogating his friends in an=20
>effort to track down that contact.
>
>The evidence is clear that there is a clamp down=20
>on all evidence pointing to Navy culpability and=20
>there is an agenda to destroy those pushing the=20
>case, particularly yours truly. It's all right=20
>there for anyone to see. It seems clear that it's=20
>a national security issue, and that under such,=20
>it's Marshall Law regarding the issue of TWA 800.=20
>
>Pointing in this direction is the fact that on=20
>the very same day (03/11/97) the FBI learned that=20
>Russell had the radar tapes, showing a possible=20
>Navy missile, and went to get the tapes, President=20
>Clinton signed Executive Order 13039, which excludes=20
>the Naval Special Warfare Development Group from=20
>federal whistle-blower protections for reasons of=20
>"national security." The SpecWarDevGru is involved=20
>in the littoral (coastal) Cruise Missile Defense=20
>program which seems to be what was happening off=20
>Long Island during the "Global Yankee '96" military=20
>exercises taking place off L.I. on July 17, 1996.
>
>You can see this eye-opening Executive Order here:
>
>http://www.pub.whitehouse.gov/white-house-publications/1997/03/1997-03-1=
1-ex
>ec-order-on-naval-special-warfare-development-group.text=20
>
>http://www.accessone.com/~rivero/CRASH/TWA/twa_labor.html
>
>E.O. 13039 went into effect one day before the Paris=20
>Match article came out showing photos of the radar=20
>tapes. I believe they fear any favorable media=20
>coverage such as the Match article, because this=20
>creates an atmosphere that could encourage "loose=20
>lips." It could make the suppressed feel it was safe=20
>to come out, that someone will listen. It seems that=20
>the master planners panicked when they realized the=20
>radar data was out and rushed to exempt the key Navy=20
>R&D group from whistle-blower protections.
>
>Allowing a fair degree of obvious media oppression=20
>may be determined as necessary to signal those that
>might speak up, that your dead meat if you do...
>look how we cooked Goddard's ass. If a Navy person
>came forward, they'd say he was perpetrating a hoax
>for money, for fame, to get back at his superiors...
>
>This is one of the most massive cover-ups in history.=20
>Anyone who takes the time to read a few of my short=20
>reports will see the utter transparency of it:
>
> http://www.erols.com/igoddard/journal.htm=20
>
>I have PROVEN that there is a cover-up:
>
> http://www.erols.com/igoddard/cover-up.htm=20
>
>I believe that my having shown its transparency is=20
>the reason I've been taken out to the woodshed by=20
>the GovtMedia for spankings over and over this last=20
>year. My butt got so sore I said I was sorry, but=20
>then they whipped my ass harder anyway, so why=20
>apologize? Hell... maybe I'm a masochist.
>
>
>
>****************************************************************
>VISIT Ian Williams Goddard ----> http://www.erols.com/igoddard
>________________________________________________________________
>
>
------=_NextPart_000_0056_01BCF45E.629D2420
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">