Re: Capitalists and coercion

From: GBurch1@aol.com
Date: Sun Oct 22 2000 - 08:11:47 MDT


In a message dated 10/20/00 9:04:19 AM Central Daylight Time, asa@nada.kth.se
writes:

> > On the other hand, I don't know how anyone could maintain that,
> > say, Sweden in the 1970s or 80s had achieved some insurmountable
> > zenith of perfection in the arrangement of human affairs. (I'm
> > picking Sweden for my own rhetorical purposes :-).
>
> It made me a transhumanist. Although that was my *reaction* to it, not
> an intended result :-)
>
>
> (I'm still living in the projects where I grew up, but now with
> broadband internet access and underneath the local cellphone antenna
> complex :-)

Speaking of Sweden . . . I read recently about how the very strong political
consensus behind the socialist plan laid out in the 1960s in Sweden was
unravelling a bit in the 1990s. Is this true? What's the financial status
of the Swedish welfare state? I've also read that the Scandinavian countries
are doing a better job of countries like Holland and Germany in keeping the
welfare state funded. Any pointers to good overview-level descriptions of
current social and political issues in Sweden and elsewhere in Scandinavia
(in English . . . sorry I don't habla Svensk)?

       Greg Burch <GBurch1@aol.com>----<gburch@lockeliddell.com>
      Attorney ::: Vice President, Extropy Institute ::: Wilderness Guide
      http://users.aol.com/gburch1 -or- http://members.aol.com/gburch1
                                           ICQ # 61112550
        "We never stop investigating. We are never satisfied that we know
        enough to get by. Every question we answer leads on to another
       question. This has become the greatest survival trick of our species."
                                          -- Desmond Morris



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:50:18 MDT