>From: "Michael S. Lorrey" <retroman@turbont.net>
>"Emlyn (onetel)" wrote:
> >
> > As I understand it, you don't have to charge money to violate copyright,
> > just damage the author's ability to make money from their work by it's
>use.
>
>This isn't true. You have to be actively charging money for providing
>others
>with the specific enjoyment of its use and NOT paying Metallica or its
>record
>company a royalty.
Word to the wise: Do not take this advice unless you want to find yourself
at the business end of a lawsuit or criminal prosecution. You might want to
take a look at the No Electronic Theft (NET) Act, signed into law by Clinton
last year.
-Zero
Learn how your computer can earn you money while you sleep!
http://www.ProcessTree.com/?sponsor=38158
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 02 2000 - 17:34:35 MDT