QueeneMUSE@aol.com wrote:
> I should have been more clear. I object to censorship bysubject, not entire
I have to agree with Nadia on this. While even I was rather taken aback by over
30 rude and insulting messages over a few days from one list member, the idea
that discussion of a subject of any kind of liberty should be banned from the
list of a group that supposedly embraces personal liberty is rather ludicrous.
One of the main reasons I joined ExI was because I found it to be one
> content. Using the metaphor of asking people not to smoke or poop on the
> floor of one's home, as opposed to letting them debate certain issues:
> That kind of "poop on the rug" stuff translates to list "pissing" - bad
> language, abusive tones, flames, thousand posts a day etc.
> That kind of thing has always been filtered and the FAQ deals with it- and I
> *liked* to see behavior censored, because it created an envorinment for free
> thought.
> But banning subjects... well...
Just as law abiding citizens are seeing their rights curtailed and made more difficult to practice because of the misbehavior of a few disrespectful individuals, so it is here.
-- TANSTAAFL!!! Michael S. Lorrey Owner, Lorrey Systems http://www.lorrey.com ArtLocate.Com http://www.artlocate.com Director, Grafton County Fish & Game Assoc. http://www.lorrey.com/gcfga/ Member, Extropy Institute http://www.extropy.org Member, National Rifle Association http://www.nra.org "Live Free or Die, Death is not the Worst of Evils." - General John Stark